Warning (in AIM) is the dumbest thing that AOL ever invented. What purpose does it ultimately serve except piss people off? It\’s like grounding a grown man. So silly and ridiculous.
So, why did AOL have to invent the rate limit? Most of us aren\’t even flooding people\’s im windows. We just have the ability to type fast.
Okay, so it all started when this seventh grader was talking to me (again). I don\’t know if it\’s me, but she seemed particularly naive and well…very…immature. I was explaining to her why our conversations were bland and uninteresting. She interpreted my explanation as fine-don\’t-talk-to-me-anymore! sign. Before blocking me, she warned me to 5%.
Then my friend thought it was funny to warn me up to 40%.
Grrrrrrrrrrr…
Did I ever mention that warning is the most stupidest thing that AOL came up with? If AOL even had the brains to do that in the first place.
lol, who\’s the 7th grader?? and how mean is that?? sheesh, and i do agree aim\’s rate limit sux, but the warning should be kept, but should be more strict, you know, so it\’s like, if someone warns you, it should kick you off or something, that would be exciting, whoever warns first wins =P
Haha, I always saw the \’warn\’ thing for AIM as a joke…it seems quite pointless :P
if you image connect with someone the rate limit thing is overriden and you can type as fast and as much as you want.
Yes, a girl…who doesn\’t leave her e-mail…and what if I want to talk to the person who warned me (who wouldn\’t want me to get their ip)…and I want to flood their window with useless words. Oh wait, that\’s what warning is supposed to prevent.